Ordering a repeat prescription from the sofa at ten at night is an ordinary thing to do in Britain now. The same search that brings up a regulated service also brings up websites with no pharmacist behind them, and from the outside it's hard to tell them apart. Both have a tidy homepage and a basket, and both promise next day delivery.

What separates them is registration, and anyone can look it up. With Anytime Doctor, for example, a UK-registered doctor reviews each consultation and only approves treatment if it's suitable. A registered pharmacy then dispenses it, and the company behind the service is overseen by its own regulator. All of these registers are free to search, and it's worth spending a few minutes on them before you type any personal details into a form.
Every pharmacy operating in Great Britain has to be registered with the General Pharmaceutical Council, and that includes the ones that only exist online. The regulator is clear on this: checking its register is the only way to be sure a pharmacy is operating legally. A genuine site shows its registration number, usually on the homepage or on the About us page, and the GPhC's own page on checking the registration of online health services explains where to type it in. The result should show the same business name and the same address as the website, and a number that returns nothing, or a different business, is the moment to close the tab.
Any prescription medicine has to be signed off by a prescriber. With an online service, that's usually a GP working remotely, who reads the patient's answers instead of seeing them in person. Doctors practising in the UK are registered with the General Medical Council, and the GMC register can be searched by name or by reference number. A healthcare professional should be happy to give their full name and registration number if asked. A reputable service won't mind the question.
The service itself answers to a regulator as well. In England that is the Care Quality Commission, which inspects online primary care providers and publishes what it finds. Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland each have their own body: Healthcare Inspectorate Wales, Healthcare Improvement Scotland and the RQIA.

The consultation itself tells you a lot. A regulated service asks questions before it approves anything: what medicines someone already takes, whether they have any allergies and what their medical history looks like. The prescriber reads those answers and decides whether the treatment is suitable. If they say no, that's a sign the checks are doing their job. Anyone who's used the same treatment for years can find the questions a chore on every reorder. They're asked each time because things change, whether that's a new medicine after a hospital stay, a pregnancy or a diagnosis since the last order. The GPhC's advice to patients puts giving an honest health history on the same list as checking the register, because a prescriber can only decide on what the form actually says. It's also a good sign if a service asks whether it can share details with the patient's own GP. It shows the service is happy for another doctor to see what it has prescribed.
A site that will post prescription-only treatment after nothing more than a card payment has skipped the step the law requires. So has one that names no prescriber anywhere, or that pushes a bulk discount before any health information has been given. The MHRA's FakeMeds campaign sends buyers in Great Britain back to the GPhC register for exactly this reason. Before you fill in the first question of any consultation, copy the registration number shown on the site and paste it into that register.
Pillreports is a global database of Ecstasy" pills based on both subjective user reports and scientific analysis. "Ecstasy" is traditionally the name for MDMA based pills, however here we also include closely related substances such as MDA, MDEA, MBDB. Pills sold as "Ecstasy" often include other, potentially more dangerous, substances such as methamphetamine, ketamine and PMA.